Times Tells Natives to Stay in Their Place

There will not likely be a return to the whiteness of social dominance and exclusive national identity. Immigration cannot be halted without damaging Western nations’ economies. . . . And the other groups who seem to be “cutting in line” are in fact getting a chance at progress that was long denied them. . . .   Western whites have a place within their nations’ new, broader national identities. But unless they accept it, the crisis of whiteness seems likely to continue. – Behind 2016’s Turmoil, a Crisis of White Identity, Amanda Taub, The New York Times, 11/1/16

Fact Check: This article is typical of many in the corporate press that try to dismiss all opposition to immigration as pure racial prejudice. But is it unreasonable or wrong to question the wisdom of arbitrarily and rapidly changing the historic racial and ethnic character of a country? Such dislocation is bound to case distrust, upheaval, and possibly even chaos.

At one time it seemed that even immigration advocates acknowledged this danger. When Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-MA) was trying to sell the 1965 immigration act to Congress, the measure that initiated the current wave of mass immigration, he specifically claimed that it wouldn’t change the ethnic make-up of the United States.

Since then, however, immigration promoters—both in the United States and Europe—insist that it is “racism” to resist a demographic free-for-all which severs all ties to the past and national continuity. As one example, white ethnic Britons now comprise less than half of the population of London, which now has a Muslim mayor. And if present trends continue those Britons will be a minority throughout the U.K. in little more than 50 years.

Could this development and the cultural changes it would entail mean anything other than the termination of Great Britain? Yet immigration advocates continue to promote it, saying that it brings “enrichment.” Westerners seem quite susceptible to this kind of insanity. Imagine if someone tried to tell the Japanese that making them a minority in Tokyo and later the rest of the country would somehow benefit Japan.

The thrust for the erasure of nations and their particular characteristics seems to come from global financial elites such as George Soros who envision a borderless world, one totally subservient to their agendas of profits and power. In the fashion of colonialists they declare that the “natives,” must submit for their own good. They may have “a place,” but only if they stay in their place. If they want to keep their national identities that somehow denies others the right to “progress.” And the destruction of their nations somehow will benefit their economies.

As self-preservation for Westerners and their historic nations is deeded to be “racism,” one might inquire as to what motivates those who make this charge. Most are Westerners themselves, usually of the elite classes. Could their strange yen for the demise of Western peoples itself be a form of racial hatred? It’s an idea worth considering.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here